{"id":784,"date":"2018-11-21T20:09:38","date_gmt":"2018-11-21T20:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sfj-pharma.com\/?p=784"},"modified":"2021-06-28T12:54:40","modified_gmt":"2021-06-28T20:54:40","slug":"annuals-of-oncology-10-20-2018-axitinib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sfj-pharma.com\/annuals-of-oncology-10-20-2018-axitinib\/","title":{"rendered":"Annuals of Oncology \u2013 10-20-2018 \u2013 Axitinib"},"content":{"rendered":"
Background:<\/strong> The ATLAS trial compared axitinib versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.<\/p>\n Patients and methods:<\/strong> In a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial, patients had >50% clear-cell RCC, had undergone nephrectomy, and had no evidence of macroscopic residual or metastatic disease [independent review committee (IRC) confirmed]. The intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients [pT2 and\/or N\u00fe, any Fuhrman grade (FG), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0\/1]. Patients (stratified by risk group\/country) received (1 : 1) oral twice-daily axitinib 5 mg or placebo for 3 years, with a 1-year minimum unless recurrence, occurrence of second primary malignancy, significant toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) per IRC. A prespecified DFS analysis in the highest-risk subpopulation (pT3, FG 3 or pT4 and\/or N\u00fe, any T, any FG) was conducted.<\/p>\n Results:<\/strong> A total of 724 patients (363 versus 361, axitinib versus placebo) were randomized from 8 May 2012, to 1 July 2016. The trial was stopped due to futility at a preplanned interim analysis at 203 DFS events. There was no significant difference in DFS per IRC [hazard ratio (HR) 1\u20444 0.870; 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.660\u20131.147; P 1\u20444 0.3211). In the highest-risk subpopulation, a 36% and 27% reduction in risk of a DFS event (HR; 95% CI) was observed per investigator (0.641; 0.468\u20130.879; P1\u204440.0051), and by IRC (0.735; 0.525\u20131.028; P1\u204440.0704), respectively. Overall survival data were not mature. Similar adverse events (AEs; 99% versus 92%) and serious AEs (19% versus 14%), but more grade 3\/4 AEs (61% versus 30%) were reported for axitinib versus placebo.<\/p>\n Conclusions:<\/strong> ATLAS did not meet its primary end point; however, improvement in DFS per investigator was seen in the highest-risk subpopulation. No new safety signals were reported.<\/p>\n Trial registration number:<\/strong> NCT01599754<\/p>\n Key words:<\/strong> adjuvant, axitinib, disease-free survival, overall survival, renal cell carcinoma, safety<\/p>\n Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial Background: The ATLAS trial compared axitinib versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Patients and methods: In…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scientific-publications"],"yoast_head":"\nRead the full article<\/a><\/h3>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"